Skip to main content
← All exclusions

Formosa Chemicals & Fibre Corp

1326

2

exclusion reasons

2 themes

Labor Rights (1) Environmental Harm (1)
1326 Current as of April 2026

This page is part of our public exclusion list — a transparency tool that shows which companies we screen out and why. It is not investment advice, and it is not an accusation. But it is subject to change as our understanding of the facts evolves.

Working Conditions
Since Nov 29, 2023

Excluded by the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global in 2020 for unacceptable risk of human rights violations. NBIM Council of Ethics documented illegal use of overtime, discrimination, and occupational safety violations at Formosa Taffeta, a subsidiary operating in Vietnam. Parent company Formosa Plastics Group is a documented serial environmental offender: the 2016 Ha Tinh steel plant disaster discharged toxic waste off the Vietnamese coast, killing millions of fish and devastating coastal fishing communities. Formosa pledged $500M in compensation to the Vietnamese government but has not adequately compensated individual victims.

Environmental Damage
Since Aug 31, 2020

Formosa Chemicals & Fibre Corp, a subsidiary of Formosa Plastics Group, operates petrochemical manufacturing facilities that have been linked to documented patterns of toxic pollution and chemical spills. In Vietnam, the company’s steel plant in Ha Tinh province was responsible for a 2016 marine environmental disaster that released toxic wastewater, devastating over 200 kilometers of coastline, killing an estimated 115 tons of fish, and impacting the livelihoods of thousands of local fishers. The incident triggered widespread protests and lawsuits from affected communities seeking compensation for damages.

The company’s operations in Texas and Louisiana have also drawn regulatory scrutiny and community opposition due to environmental risks. In Point Comfort, Texas, Formosa Plastics’ facility has a long history of air and water permit violations, including a 2019 federal lawsuit settlement under the Clean Water Act for discharging plastic pellets and other pollutants into Lavaca Bay and Cox Creek. The settlement required $50 million for environmental restoration and led to a “zero discharge” mandate. Despite this, the company is pursuing a massive $9.4 billion petrochemical complex in St. James Parish, Louisiana—a project opposed by environmental groups for its potential impact on predominantly Black communities and sensitive wetlands, and which has been challenged for its air permits. These patterns of operational negligence and contested expansion into environmentally vulnerable areas demonstrate a recurring failure to prevent ecological harm.

Research Sources 1 organization
External

Wondering what we do invest in?

The Naughty List

A digest of changes to our exclusion list — new additions, removals, and the evidence behind them. We review the list continuously as new evidence surfaces.

RSS feed No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

Companies appear on our exclusion list based on our investment judgment — not because they've done anything illegal. This is a difference of values and opinion, not an accusation of wrongdoing. Exclusion does not constitute a recommendation against investing in any company, and absence from the list does not constitute a recommendation to invest.

This information is provided for educational and transparency purposes only and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Data is drawn from independent watchdogs, NGOs, government registries, and Ethical Capital's ongoing research — see Research Sources for the full list.

Ethical Capital LLC is a state-registered investment adviser in Utah (CRD #316032). Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.