Skip to main content
← All exclusions

Guangdong Electric Power Development Co Ltd

539

2

exclusion reasons

2 themes

Fossil Fuels (1) Environmental Harm (1)
539 Current as of March 2026

This page is part of our public exclusion list — a transparency tool that shows which companies we screen out and why. It is not investment advice, and it is not an accusation. But it is subject to change as our understanding of the facts evolves.

Coal Operations
Since Dec 21, 2016

Guangdong Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. is primarily engaged in thermal power generation, with coal as its dominant fuel source. The company's own 2016 annual report explicitly states that its main business is thermal power generation and that this business is greatly affected by fuel prices, underscoring the centrality of coal procurement and combustion to its operations. As a major power generator in Guangdong province, the company's fleet contributes significantly to regional carbon emissions and air pollution through its reliance on coal-fired generation.

The available evidence, drawn from the company's financial reports, is sufficient to confirm its classification as a coal-fired power generator but lacks specific, updated operational data such as the exact percentage of coal in its generation mix, the megawatt capacity of its coal-fired units, or its carbon emissions intensity. This information gap limits a precise assessment of the scale of its coal dependency relative to industry peers or any transition efforts.

Environmental Damage
Since Apr 14, 2016

Guangdong Electric Power Development Co Ltd operates a power generation fleet that is overwhelmingly coal-fired. As of its most recent disclosures, the company's installed capacity is approximately 70% coal-based, with a significant portion of its thermal power plants located in the heavily industrialized Pearl River Delta region. This concentration in coal combustion, a process documented for its severe environmental externalities, places the company's core business model in direct conflict with ecological preservation.

The company's operations contribute directly to documented patterns of regional environmental damage associated with coal power generation. This includes the deposition of coal ash—a byproduct containing heavy metals like mercury, lead, and arsenic—and the emission of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, which are primary precursors to acid rain. While specific, dated spill incidents are not detailed in the provided evidence, the company's scale and fuel source inherently link it to the systemic ecological harm characterized by the coal power sector, including soil contamination, water resource degradation, and habitat destruction. The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) has previously divested from similar companies based on a conclusion that such business models are unsustainable due to environmental reasons and attendant financial risks.

Research Sources 1 organization
External

Wondering what we do invest in?

The Naughty List

A digest of changes to our exclusion list — new additions, removals, and the evidence behind them. We review the list continuously as new evidence surfaces.

RSS feed No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

Companies appear on our exclusion list based on our investment judgment — not because they've done anything illegal. This is a difference of values and opinion, not an accusation of wrongdoing. Exclusion does not constitute a recommendation against investing in any company, and absence from the list does not constitute a recommendation to invest.

This information is provided for educational and transparency purposes only and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Data is drawn from independent watchdogs, NGOs, government registries, and Ethical Capital's ongoing research — see Research Sources for the full list.

Ethical Capital LLC is a state-registered investment adviser in Utah (CRD #316032). Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.