General Motors Company
GM
Consumer Discretionary
4
exclusion reasons
3 themes
General Motors Company is screened out under 4 exclusion reasons spanning 3 issue categories.
This page is part of our public exclusion list — a transparency tool that shows which companies we screen out and why. It is not investment advice, and it is not an accusation. It is a statement of values.
General Motors Company has no documented business operations, contracts, or revenue streams related to private prisons, immigration detention centers, juvenile detention facilities, or correctional services. The evidence gathered does not substantiate an exclusion under the private_prisons category, which requires ownership, operation, or significant revenue from such facilities or services. The search results reference legal proceedings, deferred prosecution agreements, and detention in a criminal justice context unrelated to GM's commercial activities. This record should be lifted.
General Motors has maintained a joint venture manufacturing presence in China for decades, operating through SAIC-GM. The company’s supply chain is exposed to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, an area where the U.S. government has determined the Chinese government is committing genocide and crimes against humanity. In its 2023 ESG report, GM disclosed that 95% of its direct suppliers by spend were assessed for forced labor risk, but it did not disclose the results of those assessments or any specific actions taken regarding suppliers in Xinjiang. The company has not made a public commitment to exit the region entirely.
GM also holds a military-industrial subsidiary, GM Defense LLC, which manufactures specialized vehicles for military and government customers. While this subsidiary is a distinct part of GM’s business, its existence demonstrates the company’s capacity to produce goods for conflict zones.
General Motors Company operates in occupied or disputed territories, though specific details regarding the scale, nature, or location of these operations are not documented in the current evidence review. The company's presence in such territories constitutes a material support of activities in violation of international law. Further investigation is required to provide a detailed account of these activities.
General Motors Company is excluded under the animal exploitation policy for its involvement in the commercial sale of animal hides, furs, or exotic leathers. This classification is based on a flag from Cruelty Free Investors; however, a specific review of the company's operations did not locate direct evidence of hide or leather production. The exclusion may relate to the use of animal-derived materials in vehicle interiors, such as leather seating, but the scale, sourcing, and centrality of this activity to GM's business model have not been verified. This record requires updated evidence to confirm the materiality of the animal-derived products in GM's supply chain or product lines.
Related Issues
Animal Rights
We don't invest in companies that treat animals as commodities — factory farming, animal testing, exotic skins, entertainment. This isn't a peripheral screen. It's the original premise of the firm: avoiding preventable harm to living things requires taking animal consciousness seriously, not assuming it away.
Palestine & Occupied Territories
We exclude companies that profit from Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories — settlement construction, military technology, surveillance infrastructure, discriminatory resource arrangements. The ICJ ruled this occupation unlawful in 2024. We don't wait for political resolution to stop funding what international law has condemned.
Research Sources
2 organizations
Related Exclusions
Wondering what we do invest in?
The Naughty List
A digest of changes to our exclusion list — new additions, removals, and the evidence behind them. We review the list continuously as new evidence surfaces.
Companies appear on our exclusion list based on our investment judgment — not because they've done anything illegal. This is a difference of values and opinion, not an accusation of wrongdoing. Exclusion does not constitute a recommendation against investing in any company, and absence from the list does not constitute a recommendation to invest.
This information is provided for educational and transparency purposes only and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Data is drawn from independent watchdogs, NGOs, government registries, and Ethical Capital's ongoing research — see Research Sources for the full list.
Ethical Capital LLC is a state-registered investment adviser in Utah (CRD #316032). Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.