Johnson Controls
JCI
Industrials
2
exclusion reasons
2 themes
This page is part of our public exclusion list — a transparency tool that shows which companies we screen out and why. It is not investment advice, and it is not an accusation. But it is subject to change as our understanding of the facts evolves.
Johnson Controls has engaged in corporate restructuring that shifted tax liabilities onto its shareholders. In 2016, the company executed a merger with Tyco International, a transaction structured as a tax inversion that moved Johnson Controls' legal domicile to Ireland. The subsequent proxy statement disclosed that the conversion and cash-out of shares would be taxable events for the company's shareholders, effectively transferring the tax burden from the corporation to individual investors. This structure was engineered to achieve a lower corporate tax rate for Johnson Controls itself.
The company has defended this approach in shareholder litigation. In a 2022 brief to the Seventh Circuit, Johnson Controls argued that a dismissed shareholder suit properly upheld the merger's structure. This pattern of using complex corporate reorganizations to shed tax obligations aligns with the tax avoidance exclusion, where corporate maneuvers are designed primarily to evade tax exposure rather than address a genuine operational need.
Johnson Controls subsidiary Tyco Fire Products agreed to a $750 million settlement in April 2024 with U.S. public water systems over PFAS contamination. The lawsuits alleged that firefighting foam manufactured by Tyco polluted drinking water with these persistent “forever chemicals.” In a separate 2020 incident, the same Marinette, Wisconsin facility reported a spill of contaminated water containing arsenic and PFAS into local waterways. The Wisconsin Department of Justice subsequently alleged violations of the state’s spills law for failing to report the PFAS contamination. This pattern of incidents involving toxic, long-lasting chemicals from its operations places Johnson Controls under this exclusion.
Research Sources
15 organizations
Related Exclusions
Wondering what we do invest in?
The Naughty List
A digest of changes to our exclusion list — new additions, removals, and the evidence behind them. We review the list continuously as new evidence surfaces.
Companies appear on our exclusion list based on our investment judgment — not because they've done anything illegal. This is a difference of values and opinion, not an accusation of wrongdoing. Exclusion does not constitute a recommendation against investing in any company, and absence from the list does not constitute a recommendation to invest.
This information is provided for educational and transparency purposes only and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Data is drawn from independent watchdogs, NGOs, government registries, and Ethical Capital's ongoing research — see Research Sources for the full list.
Ethical Capital LLC is a state-registered investment adviser in Utah (CRD #316032). Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.