Norfolk Southern Corporation
NSC
Industrials
4
exclusion reasons
2 themes
This page is part of our public exclusion list — a transparency tool that shows which companies we screen out and why. It is not investment advice, and it is not an accusation. But it is subject to change as our understanding of the facts evolves.
DOJ/EPA consent decree for East Palestine, OH toxic train derailment (Feb 2023); >$310M total settlement including community relief, environmental monitoring, and remediation of contaminated soil and water; vinyl chloride and multiple hazardous materials released into Sulphur Run creek; among the largest environmental enforcement actions against a railroad in US history
DOJ/EPA East Palestine consent decree; $15M Clean Water Act civil penalty for discharge of hazardous materials into Sulphur Run, Leslie Run, and Ohio River tributaries following Feb 2023 derailment; consent decree also requires long-term groundwater monitoring and water quality testing for affected communities; part of >$310M total settlement
Norfolk Southern has faced repeated OSHA whistleblower complaints and DOL enforcement actions over retaliation against workers who report safety concerns. The railroad's labor practices have been documented as suppressing worker safety advocacy through disciplinary action.
Norfolk Southern Corporation accumulates 1,967 railroad safety violations on Good Jobs First's Violation Tracker since 2000, carrying $18.7 million in safety-related penalties — a volume that reflects not episodic lapses but persistent institutional tolerance for hazard. The February 2023 East Palestine, Ohio derailment, where a Norfolk Southern freight train carrying vinyl chloride and other toxic chemicals jumped the tracks and forced the evacuation of roughly 2,000 residents, became the most visible expression of that pattern: federal investigators attributed the wreck to an overheated wheel bearing that onboard sensors detected but that crews were not prompted to act on in time. The National Transportation Safety Board's subsequent investigation identified systemic deficiencies in wayside detection protocols and crew alerting procedures — failures the company had the technical capacity to address and chose not to prioritize.
The hazard record extends to workers long before East Palestine. A 1993 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health evaluation found that Norfolk Southern track maintenance workers were being overexposed to crystalline silica, with 27 of 50 personal breathing zone samples meeting or exceeding the NIOSH recommended limit for respirable quartz. OSHA found, across multiple concurrent investigations completed between 2011 and 2012, that Norfolk Southern had illegally retaliated against employees under the Federal Railroad Safety Act in at least six separate cases, all involving workers who either reported a workplace injury or refused to work under unsafe conditions. In a June 2012 enforcement action covering three cases alone, OSHA ordered Norfolk Southern to pay $802,168 including $525,000 in punitive damages. By late 2012, OSHA's cumulative penalty orders against Norfolk Southern for whistleblower retaliation had reached approximately $2.7 million across 14 months.
Norfolk Southern's own 2025 Safety Report describes ongoing Mechanical War Room initiatives and a 31.1 percent reduction in wayside stops — improvements framed as operational achievements rather than acknowledgments of past failure. No public accounting of the company's silica exposure legacy, the scope of retaliatory terminations, or the structural decisions that preceded the East Palestine derailment appears in that document.
Research Sources
2 organizations
Related Exclusions
Wondering what we do invest in?
The Naughty List
A digest of changes to our exclusion list — new additions, removals, and the evidence behind them. We review the list continuously as new evidence surfaces.
Companies appear on our exclusion list based on our investment judgment — not because they've done anything illegal. This is a difference of values and opinion, not an accusation of wrongdoing. Exclusion does not constitute a recommendation against investing in any company, and absence from the list does not constitute a recommendation to invest.
This information is provided for educational and transparency purposes only and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Data is drawn from independent watchdogs, NGOs, government registries, and Ethical Capital's ongoing research — see Research Sources for the full list.
Ethical Capital LLC is a state-registered investment adviser in Utah (CRD #316032). Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.