S&P GLOBAL INC
SPGI
Financials
2
exclusion reasons
1 theme
This page is part of our public exclusion list — a transparency tool that shows which companies we screen out and why. It is not investment advice, and it is not an accusation. But it is subject to change as our understanding of the facts evolves.
The DOJ required S&P Global Inc. and IHS Markit Ltd. to divest assets related to their oil price reporting and coal, metals, and mining data businesses to proceed with their merger, citing anticompetitive concerns.
In February 2015, the DOJ and 19 states secured a $1.375 billion settlement with Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC (now S&P Global) to resolve allegations that S&P defrauded investors in residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations in the lead-up to the 2008 financial crisis. The penalty — $687.5 million to the federal government and $687.5 million divided among the states — was the largest ever paid by a credit rating agency.
The DOJ alleged that between 2004 and 2007, S&P misrepresented the stringency and objectivity of its ratings, which were plagued by conflicts of interest that incentivized S&P to artificially inflate ratings in order to appease the issuers that paid millions of dollars for its services. Investors incurred substantial losses on securities for which S&P issued inflated ratings that misrepresented the true credit risks. S&P separately reached a $1.5 billion settlement with CalPERS and other institutional investors. In 2024, the SEC charged S&P Global Ratings with significant recordkeeping failures (SEC Press Release 2024-114). The MBS ratings fraud and subsequent regulatory pattern reflect an institution whose revenue model creates structural incentives to compromise analytical independence.
Research Sources
4 organizations
Related Exclusions
Wondering what we do invest in?
The Naughty List
A digest of changes to our exclusion list — new additions, removals, and the evidence behind them. We review the list continuously as new evidence surfaces.
Companies appear on our exclusion list based on our investment judgment — not because they've done anything illegal. This is a difference of values and opinion, not an accusation of wrongdoing. Exclusion does not constitute a recommendation against investing in any company, and absence from the list does not constitute a recommendation to invest.
This information is provided for educational and transparency purposes only and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Data is drawn from independent watchdogs, NGOs, government registries, and Ethical Capital's ongoing research — see Research Sources for the full list.
Ethical Capital LLC is a state-registered investment adviser in Utah (CRD #316032). Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.