Our Process

Three Principles, Three Stages

How we avoid preventable harm, seek available goodness, and know the difference.

Public companies find new and exciting ways to disappoint us all the time. And so does the state of the world.

Our principles and process are designed to give clients an intuitive grasp of how we will react to these unspecified and uncertain possible futures.

Three simple goals sit at the center of our process:

These aren’t hyper-specific rules that calcify over time. They’re organizing principles that guide action through uncertain terrain.

We rely on thought experiments to create distance from our own biases. One technique—veil-of-ignorance reasoning, derived from philosopher John Rawls—helps us wrestle with difficult situations by considering how we’d feel about them without knowing who among the affected parties we’d be.

Research shows this consistently leads to choices that favor the greater good (Huang et al., 2019).

Process to Portfolio

%%{init: {"theme":"base"}}%%
flowchart LR
    A["Investable Universe<br/>5,090 Companies<br/>(≥$250M market cap)"] --> B{Ethical<br/>Screening}
    B -- "Pass: 3,098" --> C["Eligible Universe<br/>3,098 Companies"]
    B -- "Fail: 1,992 (39%)" --> EX[(Excluded<br/>Database)]

    C --> E["Company Analysis<br/>6 Key Dimensions"]

    E --> F{Investment<br/>Decision}
    F -- "Selected: 40-50 (1.5%)" --> G["Investment<br/>Strategy"]
    F -- "Learn & Revisit" --> RD[(Research<br/>Database)]

    G --> P[(Portfolio<br/>Holdings)]

    P --> J[Ongoing<br/>Review]
    J -.-> E
    RD -.-> E

    style A fill:#ffffff,stroke:#581c87,stroke-width:2px,color:#581c87
    style C fill:#f0fdfc,stroke:#14b8a6,stroke-width:2px,color:#0f766e
    style EX fill:#fef2f2,stroke:#dc2626,stroke-width:2px,color:#dc2626
    style P fill:#f0fdf4,stroke:#16a34a,stroke-width:3px,color:#16a34a
    style J fill:#fffbeb,stroke:#f59e0b,stroke-width:2px,color:#d97706
    style RD fill:#f3f4f6,stroke:#6b7280,stroke-width:2px,color:#374151

    classDef processBox fill:#581c87,stroke:#581c87,stroke-width:2px,color:#ffffff
    classDef analysisBox fill:#14b8a6,stroke:#0f766e,stroke-width:2px,color:#ffffff

    class B,F processBox
    class E analysisBox

    linkStyle 0 stroke:#581c87,stroke-width:2px
    linkStyle 1 stroke:#16a34a,stroke-width:2px
    linkStyle 2 stroke:#dc2626,stroke-width:2px
    linkStyle 3 stroke:#374151,stroke-width:2px
    linkStyle 4 stroke:#374151,stroke-width:2px
    linkStyle 5 stroke:#6b7280,stroke-width:2px
    linkStyle 6 stroke:#374151,stroke-width:2px
    linkStyle 7 stroke:#f59e0b,stroke-width:2px
    linkStyle 8 stroke:#374151,stroke-width:2px


1. Avoid Preventable Harm (Screening, Divestment, & Exclusions)

Our process begins by removing all companies associated with harmful products or conduct from consideration as outlined in our policy.

Our screening framework divides into two primary policy types, each addressing a distinct form of risk.

Product-Based Exclusions

What companies make and sell — categorical rejections of harmful business lines.

  • Meat, dairy, eggs
  • Leathers, furs
  • Animal equipment
  • Weapons & materiel
  • Defense equipment
  • Alcohol, tobacco, gambling
  • Exploitative products
  • Oil & gas
  • Mining
  • Consumer tracking
  • For-profit prisons
Strategic Product Commitments
  • 🌱 Plant Based Treaty - Supporting the transition to sustainable food systems
  • ⚗️ Petrochemical Commitments - Avoiding companies dependent on fossil fuel derivatives

Conduct-Based Exclusions

How companies behave — corporate actions and patterns of harm from operational choices.

  • Animal harm
  • Human rights violations
  • War crimes
  • Indigenous rights failures
  • Water abuse
  • Environmental damage
  • GHG emissions
  • Climate failures
  • Diversity failures
  • Info security failures
  • Oversight failures
  • Corruption & fraud
  • Anti-union behavior
  • Criminal convictions
  • Tax avoidance
  • Predatory lending
  • Political contributions
  • Data exploitation
  • Ethical violations
Strategic Conduct Commitments
  • 🇿🇦 Apartheid Free Pledge - No investments in companies supporting Israeli apartheid

The Impact: Reshaping the Investable Universe

Database Metrics

2,872 active exclusions

36% from ECIC proprietary research

291 (58%) of S&P 500 companies excluded

$40.7T (75%) of S&P 500 market cap excluded

(as of August 2025)

Our screening framework substantially narrows the field:

  • Starting universe: 5,090 US companies with market cap ≥ $250M
  • Excluded: 1,992 companies flagged for products or conduct issues
  • Exclusion rate: 39% of the investable universe
  • Eligible for analysis: 3,098 companies move to the next stage

View Complete Screening Policy →

2. Seek Available Goodness (Company Analysis)

After ethical screening, 3,098 companies remain. We evaluate every candidate across six dimensions:

People & Leadership

  • Leadership quality, retention, governance
  • Stakeholder relationships and engagement
  • Culture strength and diversity
  • Track record of execution

Product & Innovation

  • Pipeline strength and innovation capacity
  • Market differentiation and competitive positioning
  • Quality standards and product responsibility
  • Market fit and customer adoption

Operations

  • R&D efficiency and resource allocation
  • Go-to-market execution and distribution
  • Supply chain resilience and risk management
  • Operational metrics and efficiency trends

Financial

  • Balance sheet health and capital structure
  • Capital allocation discipline and track record
  • Growth durability and cash generation
  • Valuation relative to intrinsic value

Competitive Moat

  • Barriers to entry and structural advantages
  • Network effects and scale benefits
  • Brand equity and pricing power
  • Durability of competitive position

Risk Assessment

  • Adoption and market risks
  • Disruption threats and competitive dynamics
  • Regulatory and geopolitical exposure
  • Environmental dependencies and climate risks
  • Liquidity, volatility, and permanent capital loss scenarios

3. Know the Difference (Decision Refinement & Learning)

Ethical investing requires humility—we won’t always get it right. This stage is about recognizing uncertainty, refining judgment, and adapting as our understanding deepens.

Ongoing Analysis & Review

  • Scenario analysis and stress testing
  • Regular re-scoring of every holding
  • Research database updates after each analysis
  • Mental models challenged in investment committee reviews

Evolution & Adaptation

  • Screening criteria evolve as ethical understanding shifts
  • Process improvements from quarterly retrospectives
  • Client feedback investigated and incorporated when valid
  • Continuous learning captured in research knowledge base

Ready to See This Process in Action?

Our three strategies—Growth, Income, and Diversification—apply this process to different investment goals and time horizons.

How implementation varies: Our Growth Strategy has no compromises—we pick the stocks, full stop. But Income and Diversification strategies sometimes need to balance what clients require (steady dividends, daily liquidity) with what our ethical framework allows. If you see a gap between our policy and a holding, it’s because we couldn’t find a compliant alternative that meets the strategy’s core requirements.

View Investment Strategies


Additional Resources


Investment strategies involve risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Our investment process and exclusion criteria may limit opportunities and affect performance compared to strategies without such constraints.