Skip to main content

Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund

PORTX

54.4%

Excluded by weight

35

Excluded companies

84

Total holdings

74.9%

Active share vs S&P 500

Highly active

Why active share matters

Active share measures what fraction of this fund's portfolio is genuinely different from the S&P 500. A fund with 0% active share is identical to the index. 100% means no overlap.

Index funds and near-index funds should have very low active share — that's the point. A plain S&P 500 index fund will show ~0%. A fund that tracks the index but removes a handful of companies might show 3–8%. Low active share is expected for index strategies; what matters is whether a fund claiming to be actively managed is actually doing anything different.

The number that matters isn't excluded % alone — it's excluded % paired with active share. A fund can exclude hundreds of companies and still be 97% the same as the S&P 500, because the excluded companies represented a tiny share of the index by market weight.

A fund with high exclusions but low active share is excluding companies that barely affect its returns. It's still tracking the index. The ethical stance is real; the portfolio impact is not. A fund with high exclusions and high active share is genuinely different — the exclusions actually move the portfolio.

Holdings as of end-of-period filing dated December 30, 2025. Source: SEC N-PORT filing / fund provider disclosure.

Filter by harm category

Screened out

35 companies · 54.4% by weight
MSFT5.98%

Microsoft Corp.

See why excluded →
NVDA5.79%

NVIDIA Corp.

See why excluded →
GOOGL5.58%

Alphabet Inc.

See why excluded →
AAPL3.31%

Apple Inc.

See why excluded →
V2.30%

Visa Inc

See why excluded →
TJX1.89%

The TJX Companies Inc.

See why excluded →
NOW1.89%

Servicenow Inc

See why excluded →
BK1.79%

The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.

See why excluded →
NFLX1.50%

Netflix, Inc.

See why excluded →
ICE1.47%

Intercontinental Exchange Inc

See why excluded →
VRTX1.33%

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

See why excluded →
CDNS1.30%

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

See why excluded →
PANW1.29%

Palo Alto Networks Inc

See why excluded →
PNC1.24%

PNC Financial Services Group Inc.

See why excluded →
FSLR1.21%

First Solar Inc

See why excluded →
INTU1.16%

Intuit Inc

See why excluded →
ECL1.14%

Ecolab Inc.

See why excluded →
TT1.10%

Trane Technologies PLC

See why excluded →
PLD0.99%

Prologis Inc.

See why excluded →
ELV0.96%

Elevance Health Inc.

See why excluded →
KRYAF0.91%

Kerry Group PLC

See why excluded →
MAR0.84%

Marriott International, Inc.

See why excluded →
JLL0.84%

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated

See why excluded →
AMAT0.84%

Applied Materials Inc.

See why excluded →
GILD0.84%

Gilead Sciences Inc.

See why excluded →
MRK0.83%

Merck & Co., Inc

See why excluded →
ACN0.81%

Accenture PLC

See why excluded →
DE0.79%

Deere & Company

See why excluded →
MKC0.78%

McCormick & Company, Incorporated

See why excluded →
CMG0.70%

Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc

See why excluded →
UNP0.69%

Union Pacific Corporation

See why excluded →
SYK0.68%

Stryker Corporation

See why excluded →
CSCO0.61%

Cisco Systems, Inc.

See why excluded →
SBUX0.55%

Starbucks Corp.

See why excluded →
LULU0.48%

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

See why excluded →

Own PORTX? See your full picture.

This fund is one piece. Scan your entire portfolio to see your total exposure across all holdings and funds.

About this screening

Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund applies its own values-based screening methodology. We analyze it because that shared practice — using an ethical framework to exclude companies for non-financial reasons — makes the comparison meaningful. This fund's methodology differs from ours. The purpose of this page is to make those differences tangible and help investors know what they own.